Youth Leader decries collapse of Obidient movement over Obi’s recent comment
Youth Leader decries collapse of Obidient movement over Obi’s recent comment
Tensions are rising within the Obidient Movement and the Labour Party (LP) after a recent Twitter post by Peter Obi, the party’s 2023 presidential candidate, sparked confusion over the future of the movement.
In the post, Obi distanced himself from the idea of the Obidient Movement being formally tied to the Labour Party. He stated that while the movement’s members could belong to various political parties, they all shared a common goal of bringing about change in Nigeria.
This declaration has left many within the movement and the party questioning its direction and unity moving forward.
The tweet has raised concerns about potential fragmentation within the Obidient Movement, which was once seen as a powerful and unified force during the 2023 election campaign.
“I like to categorically state that the Obidient Movement is not a directorate of any particular political party. Any individual or individuals claiming to be leaders of this non-existent directorate are simply not members of the broader Obidient Movement.
“There may be a youth mobilisation directorate in political parties, but the Obidient Movement is far beyond a particular political party. The Obidient Movement is a diverse and inclusive collective that transcends traditional political, religious, and ethnic affiliations. It is not domiciled within any particular party or headquartered in any particular part of the country. Its membership spans across Africa and the globe, comprising individuals from various backgrounds, including rural communities, and public, private, and corporate entities, united by a shared vision for a new and better Nigeria.
“Guided by the principles of adaptive and transformative change, progress, discipline, and democratic values, the Obidient Movement advocates for fairness, equity, inclusivity, and justice,” Obi tweeted.
Meche Oswald, the Coordinator of Obidient Youth Ambassadors, recently issued a statement titled ‘Obidient Movement Fragmentation: Unintended Consequences Of Peter Obi’s Statement.’
In the statement, he expressed regret that Obi had made such remarks, suggesting that it would have been wiser for him to either avoid making the statement or seek counsel before sharing his views.
Oswald argued that while unintended, Obi’s statement implies that Obidients are free to align with any political party or group they choose. He also linked Obi’s comments to the ongoing defections of lawmakers elected under the Labour Party (LP) to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).
“Upon scrutinising the implications of Peter Obi’s statement, I am compelled to express my reservations regarding its potential consequences. In hindsight, I wish he had refrained from making that statement, or at the very least, sought counsel before sharing his thoughts.
“This sentiment suggests that he does not believe the Obidient Movement should be tied to a single political party. I dare say that some individuals who defected from the Labour Party to the APC did so largely due to the perceived ambiguity in Obi’s statement.
“I had a conversation with one such individual who defected recently, a member of the Federal House of Representatives. He revealed that they were emboldened by Obi’s words, which they interpreted as a tacit endorsement of their decision to switch parties.”
Oswald argued that Peter Obi’s tweet would have a lasting negative impact on his political future. He also suggested that Obi might be acting under pressure, particularly due to the influence of Marcel Ngogbehei, the Director General of the LP Directorate of Mobilisation and Integration, and the various pressures he has been facing from different sources.
“In retrospect, I wish Peter Obi had given more thought to the potential repercussions of his statement before sharing it with the public. It is possible that he was acting under duress, given the immense pressure he faced from various quarters, including the fear of Marcel Ngogbehei.
“Marcel, unfortunately, became the target of unjustified vilification, and I hope to have the opportunity to share his story in the future.
“Just as I envisaged, most of the self-seeking, power-hungry individuals who were part of those that forced Obi into making that statement have started joining other political parties. The latest brides are NRM and ADC.
“These duplicitous and depraved characters parading themselves as Obidients and former members of the Labour Party had a plan to pull down the Labour Party before moving on just because they couldn’t hijack the control of the party,” Oswald noted.
He praised Barrie Julius Abure for standing firm and demonstrating remarkable strength. He emphasized that Abure has now truly showcased the power and wisdom of true leadership.
“One of the primary challenges facing Peter Obi today is his reluctance to risk losing the support of certain influential individuals. For instance, his current rift with Abure is motivated by a desire to maintain relationships with certain key persons.
“While this is a topic for another day, it is essential to acknowledge the fractionalisation of the Obidient Movement and the urgent need to address this issue,” he lamented.
The leader of the Obidient Movement acknowledged that the group is currently weak and fighting to stay relevant. He stated that what was once a dynamic and spontaneous force for change has now dwindled into a collection of people engaging in endless ranting and gossip.
“I have come to realise the distinction between a follower and a supporter. A follower sacrifices his autonomy and ability to think critically. In contrast, a supporter engages in thoughtful analysis, maintains their independence, and provides constructive feedback. The latter approach is essential for building a more inclusive and supportive environment within the Obidient Movement.
“Returning to my primary concern, the Obidient Movement is grappling with internal power struggles, which have unfortunately entangled Peter Obi. In hindsight, it would have been prudent for him to seek clarification on Abure’s intentions in ordaining the Obidient Directorate before reacting publicly.
“By doing so, he could have avoided the current predicament and instead found common ground with Abure.
“Obi has inadvertently created a perception among Obidients that they can affiliate with any political party of their choice. This has culminated in a fragmented movement, thereby undermining the movement’s cohesion and collective purpose.
“Abure’s honest motivation and intention were aimed at harmonising the Obidient Movement. Now, the DMI is achieving what the Obidient Directorate was initially designed to do. If the Obidient Directorate was allowed to live, there would not be the issue of defection today.
“The Labour Party Directorate of Mobilisation and Integration (DMI) headed by Marcel Ngogbehei, is building a solid nest for all interests. The Labour Party is waxing very strong under the visionary leadership of Barrister Julius Abure,” the statement added.
News
BREAKING; Lagos Assembly gives update on lawmakers arrested by DSS over impeachment of Obasa
BREAKING; Lagos Assembly gives update on lawmakers arrested by DSS over impeachment of Obasa
The Lagos State House of Assembly has confirmed that the Department of State Security (DSS) has released the detained lawmakers after hours of interrogation over the speakership crisis.
The Chairman, Ad Hoc Committee on Information, Mr Stephen Ogundipe, confirmed the development to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Lagos on Thursday.
NAN reports that two lawmakers, Lanre Afinni (Lagos Island 2) and Sylvester Ogunkelu, were detained on Thursday morning by DSS officials in the state.
The lawmakers were interrogated over the removal of former Speaker Mudashiru Obasa, who was ousted by a majority of members on Jan. 13 and replaced by Mojisola Meranda.
They were allegedly detained for breaking into a House store where the mace was kept, enabling lawmakers to sit and impeach the former speaker.
In solidarity, Deputy Speaker Mojeed Fatai and other members stormed the DSS office to secure their colleagues’ release.
Confirming the development, Ogundipe told NAN that all detained lawmakers had now regained their freedom.
He said the Assembly reaffirmed that Obasa’s removal was legal and constitutional, following due process.
“Today, members of the Lagos Assembly honoured an invitation from the Lagos DSS Command in Shangisha. We provided insights into the removal of the ex-speaker.
“At the DSS office, we reaffirmed our commitment to upholding constitutional governance following his removal.
“The decision followed the 1999 Constitution and the Powers and Privileges Act, which empower the Assembly to regulate its internal proceedings without interference.
“Sections 92 and 96 outline the process for electing and removing the Speaker, and we adhered to due process.
“It is public knowledge that legislative autonomy allows state assemblies to conduct their business freely within designated chambers,” he said.
Ogundipe insisted that the former speaker’s removal was democratic and met the required legal majority.
He said any challenge to this lawful action undermines the constitutional authority granted to the Assembly.
The Assembly, he emphasised, exercised its constitutional duty in the best interest of Lagos residents.
Ogundipe commended the DSS for its professionalism, especially the Lagos Command Director, for ensuring a smooth engagement.
He said the invitation allowed them to present their account of events in a professional and comfortable environment.
He also reiterated the Assembly’s commitment to legislative duties that serve people of Lagos and ensure effective governance.
Ogundipe urged all stakeholders, including the executive and the public, to respect legislative proceedings and avoid undue interference. (NAN)
News
Several people feared killed others injured as Security personnel invade kidnappers den
Several people feared killed others injured as Security personnel invade kidnappers den
Anambra State’s security outfit, Agunechemba, launched a daring assault on a notorious hideout of gunmen and kidnappers early Thursday morning, leaving several feared dead and others fleeing with injuries.
The raid, which occurred around 1 a.m. in Enugu-Agidi, Njikoka Local Government Area, marks the latest in a series of successful operations since the formation of the security group, modeled after the defunct “Bakassi Boys” from the late Governor Chinwoke Mbadinuju’s era.
The operation, which involved troops from “Udo Ga Achi” alongside other security agencies like the Police, DSS, and the Military, was based on actionable intelligence.
One gunman was apprehended during the raid, while multiple weapons and items were recovered, including two AK-47 rifles, eight pump-action guns, four locally made pistols, 101 cartridges, four empty AK-47 magazines, three cutlasses, a Baofeng radio, a motorcycle, and a variety of charms.
Agunechemba’s efforts have already resulted in the destruction of six known criminal camps, a sign of the group’s growing success in tackling the state’s rising insecurity.
Anambra has been grappling with violence, as gunmen and kidnappers continue to terrorize the region, with many lives lost and several others abducted in the ongoing crime wave.
News
Kaduna train attack: I paid N80 million ransom for my mum, sister’s release–witness
Kaduna train attack: I paid N80 million ransom for my mum, sister’s release–witness
A masked witness, identified as Prosecution Witness-D (PW-D) on Thursday, told a Federal High Court in Abuja that he paid N80 million ransom for the release of his mother and sister during the 2022 Abuja-Kaduna train terrorists attack .
The witness testified before Justice Inyang Ekwo in the ongoing trial of Mr Tukur Mamu, the kidnap negotiator, who is facing a 10-count terrorism charge.
He said his mother and sister were released alongside two other victims of the attack.
The PW-4 was lead in evidence by the lawyer to the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), David Kaswe.
The witness, also identified simply as “D,” said that he was informed at about 8.30 pm on March 28, 2022, that his mother and sister were on the ill-fated train in which passengers were kidnapped, some killed, some injured and some rescued.
He said that the following morning of the attack, he went to Kaduna Hospital where the injured passengers were taken to but he could not find his mother or sister.
He said two weeks after the train attack, he received a call from the kidnappers, who wanted him to speak with a victim, who turned out to be his sister.
He said he communicated regularly with the abductors for about two weeks before they demanded for N200 million ransom each from victims’ relatives.
He said though some paid, the witness said a month after the ransom was demanded, the kidnappers called him through his sister and gave him names of four journalists through whom negotiation could be done.
The PW-D said four journalists’ names and their phone numbers were given to him.
He further stated that he contacted three of the names and they declined.
The witness, however, said among the four journalists, only Tukur Mamu volunteered “to take up the responsibility.”
“Two days later, I received a call from my sister and my sister told me that she was in good shape and that I should not get agitated.”
The witness told the court that his sister informed him that the kidnappers said his mother, sister and some others were not their target.
“She said they were victims of circumstances that they were circumstantial victims that they were not the targets.
“I asked about my late mum and she said they were all doing good,” he said.
He said that while they were struggling to raise the money, one Friday, he received calls from former Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Lucky Irabor, and former Director General, Department of State Service (DSS), Yusuf Bichi.
He said he was asked to see Irabor in Abuja.
He said he visited Irabor and told him his plights and the little he knew.
He said Irabor instructed him that whatever he discussed with Mamu, he should let him (Irabor) know.
He said Irabor thereafter linked him with a committee set up by the Federal Government to facilitate the release of the kidnapped victims
He said the kidnappers stopped communicating with him after he told them that Mamu had accepted “to take up the responsibility.”
“As soon as they contacted Tukur Mamu, they stopped communicating with us. Every information is from Tukur Mamu.
“We will go to Tukur Mamu and he will tell us they have asked us to pay 100 million each.
“When the negotiation was going on, we had to link Tukur Mamu with the CDS committee.”
He said that on a fateful day, his sister called him that he should go back to Mamu and negotiate.
The witness said he called Mamu but he told him that he had pencilled his name down and would not discussed with him any longer.
“After some people started getting their loved ones out, it got to a stage that kidnappers were no longer talking with CDS committee.
“It should be noted that Tukur Mamu penciled me as government agent. So he never wants to talk to me.”
The witness said he was handicap and approached his (witness) relation who was once Mamu’s boss and the man obliged and intervened.
He said the ransom was then reduced from N200 million to N150 million, to N100 million before they accepted to take N80 million.
He said that in August 2022 when he brought the N80 million ransom in cash to Mamu in his compound in Kaduna, he asked him to convert it to dollar.
The witness said he did and got a total of 118,750 U.S. dollars .
He said two weeks after, Mamu called him for an additional money to make it up a total of 120,000 dollars.
The witness said he took the money to Mamu on Thursday but he was informed by him that the kidnappers had difficulties due to swampy terrain.
He said after Jumai prayer on Friday, the next day, Mamu called to informed that he had established contact with the kidnappers.
“I drove out from Mamu’s compound on a hired gulf car packed with bread and milk as demanded by the kidnappers.”
He said that after about 20 minutes, he received a call asking him to follow a vehicle in front marked 211 and they went towards Binin Gwari.
He said after the town, they stopped and the kidnappers came and brought his mother and sister and the other two victims.
Under cross examination by the defence counsel Abdul Mohammed SAN, the witness said he took the money he brought and a written note from Mamu to the kidnappers.
The witness said he did not know whether the CDS communicated with Mamu because he was not a member of the committee.
He clarified that a former commissioner negotiated with Mamu.
He agreed with the defence counsel that the kidnappers said they needed four journalists that they would pay to do a job for them.
On whether it was the kidnappers that were dictating what should be done, the judge said the court would determine that from the record.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the Federal Government had, on March 21, 2023, arraigned Mamu for allegedly aiding terrorist operations in the country.
The Kaduna-based Islamic scholar was further accused of collecting various sums of money in different currencies from families of victims of the train attack, on behalf of the Boko Haram terrorists sect.
FG told the court that investigations revealed that the defendant collected an aggregate sum of $420, 000 from families of the victims, as well as N21 million from another set of families of the train attack.
It further alleged that Mamu concealed funds he earned from services he rendered to the terrorist organisation, in his residence in Kaduna State.
It told the court that the defendant had sometime in 2022, in Kaduna State, received ransom payments in the sum of N500, 000 on behalf of the Boko haram terrorist group, from families of the train attack that were held as hostages.
More so, in the charge that was signed by the Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation (DPPF), Mr M.B. Abubakar, FG added that the defendant exchanged voice note communications with one Baba Adamu, identified as spokesperson of the Boko Haram, in relation to acts of terrorism.
It maintained that the defendant acted in breach of the Terrorism Prevention, Prohibition Act, 2022.
Mamu, however, denied all the allegations.(NAN)
-
5 years ago
Our situation in Kano terrible – Gov Ganduje cries out
-
News1 week ago
DPO under investigation for allegedly taking teenage girl to his home while in police custody
-
News5 days ago
JUST IN; Commissioner of Police bows out of Service
-
News1 week ago
BREAKING; President Tinubu commissions Bola Ahmed Tinubu Barracks
-
News1 day ago
BREAKING; NLC declare nationwide protest
-
News4 days ago
JUST IN: 30 graves, shrine dangerous weapons found inside Hotel
-
News1 week ago
EFCC ‘most wicked Agency, Police better than them in Nigeria’ – Bobrisky
-
News1 week ago
JUST IN; Best University in Nigeria 2025 emerges see full list