Connect with us

Published

on

banner

What happened at Lagos Airport; Oshiomhole finally breaks silence

Senator Adams Oshiomhole, who represents Edo North and is a former governor of Edo State, has shed light on the altercation involving him and Air Peace staff at the Murtala Muhammed Airport Terminal 1 (Zulu Hall) on Wednesday morning.

Advertisement

Speaking to Vanguard after footage of the incident went viral, Oshiomhole claimed that the chaos stemmed from the airline’s refusal to allow him and other passengers board a scheduled flight to Abuja, despite having completed online check-in procedures.

He alleged that Air Peace denied entry to several confirmed passengers and instead resold the seats at inflated prices to standby travelers.

Advertisement

“It wasn’t just about me. Other passengers were left stranded too. We had checked in online, yet we were stopped from boarding for reasons that were never clearly explained,” he said.

According to the senator, the situation quickly escalated after he confronted airline staff over what he described as “exploitative” and “disrespectful” practices.

Advertisement

The confrontation drew attention at the terminal and briefly disrupted boarding operations.

Air Peace, in an earlier statement, maintained that Oshiomhole had arrived after the flight’s boarding gate had closed and denied allegations of misconduct.

Advertisement

Oshiomhole said: “I booked Air Peace… They delayed the flight for over five hours. In the end, they announced a cancellation. I had to get another ticket. Yesterday, I booked a flight for 6:30 a.m., which is their first flight today. I booked and asked them to check me in online, which I did, along with two other Ghanaians who met me in Lagos. We checked in online just to avoid the last-minute issues I’ve had with them a couple of times.

“I got there at about five minutes past six. They told me the counter was closed. I told them, ‘No, I’ve already checked in.’ I showed them the evidence of my online check-in. Even before then, they had asked if I had checked in, and I told them yes, and that I had no luggage. They looked at it but still said the gate had been closed. Meanwhile, I noticed they were still taking other people in.

Advertisement

“So I asked, ‘How can you close boarding for a 6:30 flight at 6:05? What is the purpose of online check-in, then?’ If I had to go through another check-in process, then what’s the point of checking in online?

“While speaking to them, I saw many men and women who had been there even before me, with similar experiences. Basically, they were selling tickets on the spot at higher prices. I’ll give you an example. A lady bought her ticket for N146,000 online. She arrived at the airport at 5:55 a.m. for the 6:30 a.m. flight, after the gatemen had delayed her.

Advertisement

“They told her she was late and that the counter had closed for check-in. She said that was impossible, as it wasn’t even 6:00 a.m. They told her she would be put on the next flight. She protested, saying, ‘Why? Put me on this flight.’ But they told her the flight was full and she would have to wait.

“Meanwhile, the airline was selling tickets on the spot for between N200,000 and N300,000. To take advantage of the situation, they discouraged those who had bought tickets online at lower rates and sold to people willing to pay more.

Advertisement

“I asked the manager, ‘What is this woman’s crime? She has a baby that’s no more than six months old. How can you refuse to board her when the aircraft is still on the ground and more people are buying tickets?’ You cannot continue like this. Tomorrow, everyone will blame the government. You have regulatory agencies, and they are all compromising. You cannot board people buying tickets on the spot and deny those who booked days ago or checked in online.

“By the time the DSS and Air Force personnel came to find out what happened, they intervened and offered to put the woman on the next flight—the same offer they had made to me earlier. But to board that next flight, they told her she would have to pay N109,100. This was in addition to the original N146,000 ticket, meaning she would spend about N256,000 for a one-hour flight to Abuja. There were many others in the same situation, and everyone was shouting at the airport.

Advertisement

“I said to the manager, ‘You must follow the rules.’ Many people were stranded, except those who could afford another ticket. I followed the woman to the counter and told her to do whatever they asked. Those of us who were also prevented from flying gathered there. Even when an officer offered me access to a lounge, people around said, ‘Comrade, please don’t leave—this is how they’ve been treating us.’

“I had to send that woman N500,000. That’s basically what happened. I told them this cannot be allowed. I checked in online and arrived on time. The aircraft hadn’t taken off. I’m not supposed to check in twice. The rowdiness arose because many people were denied boarding while tickets were being sold on the spot to others.”

Advertisement
banner
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

BREAKING :Nigerian Army rescues late General’s wife after gun battle with bandits

Published

on

banner

*

Troops of the Nigerian Army have rescued Mrs Abubakar, wife of the late retired Maj.-Gen. Rabe Abubakar, following a gun battle with bandits in Katsina State.

Advertisement

A credible military source told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) that the rescue was carried out by troops of the 17 Brigade during an ongoing search-and-rescue mission for the retired general’s family.

According to the source, the troops made contact with the bandits at Tunga village, leading to an exchange of gunfire.

Advertisement

“The bandits reportedly shot Mrs Abubakar before fleeing under pressure from the advancing troops,” the source disclosed.

The source said the troops rescued her, administered first aid, and immediately began evacuating her to a medical facility in Dutsin-Ma for treatment.

Advertisement

“Troops of 17 Brigade rescued Mrs Abubakar after making contact with the bandits at Tunga village.

“The bandits shot her and fled. She was bleeding, but troops administered first aid and are moving her to Dutsin-Ma for medical attention,” a military source said.

Advertisement

The rescue comes two days after the Defence Headquarters confirmed the death of Maj.-Gen. Abubakar (rtd.), who was abducted alongside his wife by bandits.

Military authorities are yet to issue an official statement on the incident. (NAN)

Advertisement
banner
Continue Reading

News

JUST IN: Court orders INEC to de-register ADC, Accord, other Political Parties

Published

on

banner

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and four other parties over failure to meet the constitutional threshold to be eligible as political parties.

Justice Peter Lifu, in a judgment, ordered INEC to deregistered the affected parties having failed to secure 25 per cent of the votes in the last general elections in compliance with the provisions of the law.

Advertisement

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the five political parties include ADC, Accord (A), Action Alliance (AA), Action Peoples Party (APP) and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).

Judtice Lifu, who earlier dismissed all the multiple preliminary objections filed by the defendants, ordered INEC not to allow the parties participate in the subsequent elections, including the 2027 general polls, having failed to meet the constitutional threshold.

Advertisement

A group, the Incorporated Trustees of the National Forum of Former Legislators had filed the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2026 against the five political parties.

The plaintiff named INEC, the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), ADC, AA, APP, A, ZLP as 1st to 7th defendants respectively in the suit.

Advertisement

The group prayed the court for an order of injunction restraining the INEC from receiving or accepting from the five parties or any of ifs organs for the purposes of conducting any political activities to seek votes for their members.

The group argued that the parties failed to secure at least one elected seat af the presidential, governorship, National Assembly, House of Assembly and/or councillorship elections in Nigeria in accordance with the provisions of Section 225(A) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), among other reliefs.

Advertisement

Delivering the judgment, Justice Lifu held that the questions raised and transmitted to the court by the plainttiff in the amended originating summons were all answered in the affirmative.

“Consequently, the plaintiff case succeeds in part as follows:

Advertisement

“It is hereby declared that the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th defendabts having failed to secure, meet up with and comply with the 25 per cent constitutional threshold to be eligible as political parties and having failed to satisfy all constitutional pre-conditions to have the status of a registered political party in Nigeria should be deregistered by the 1st defendant (INEC) from the list of political parties.

“The 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th defendants, having faild to secure the constitutional threshold, should be deregistered from the list of registered political patties in Nigetia and are therefore not eligible or entitled to participate in the general electiins scheduled for 2027 or any other date set by the 1st defendant.

Advertisement

“The 1st defendant is hereby directed and ordered to set the necessary machineries in motion for deregistration of the affected political parties and should not accept any correspondence from the affected entities forthwith.”

The judge further ordered the electoral umpire “to employ its constitutional and all its legal powers to deregister any political party that had not met the constitutional minimum threshold with a view to sanitising the political space.”

Advertisement

Justice Lifu, however, did not make an order as to cost.

Earlier in the ruling, the judge dimissed all the objections raised by the five parties including INEC.

Advertisement

The judge held that the argument by the five political parties that a stay of proceedings had already been granted by the Court of Appeal was no longer tenable, the parties having adopted their final written addresses and the matter adjourned for judgement.

“The words used in Section 225A of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) are plain, direct, express and simple and should be given its literal meaning.

Advertisement

“Any deviation therefrom will not meet the goal and the mischief the lawmakers want fo cure.

“Proliferation of political parties without any purposeful and intentional design to promote democratic ideals should be discouraged.

Advertisement

“Any tendencies towards pollution of the political environment by making merchandise of the ignorant members and the electorate must be frown at by the court.”

According to him, there is the argument in this suit that the Court of Appeal has stayed the judgment of this court.

Advertisement

“It must be recognised that this court has the obligation indeed to observe due difference to the highly honoured orders and decision of appellate court in the tradition of much cherished practice of adjudication under and in view of the constitutional hierarchy of court structure.

“It must also be remembered that as at the time of adoption of final written addresses of all the learned counsel for the parties in this suit, there was no order for stay of proceedings from any court served on this court neither was any such extant order of any appellate court shown to the court by any of the learned counsel.

Advertisement

“All what is on record of this court was that there is a pending interlocutory appeal, suffice it to say that the application for stay in this court has been heard and ruling duly entered in form of dismissal.

“The position of the law is that the rules of court do not have provision for the arrest of judgement as the defendants in this case are attempting to do,” he held, citing previous decisions of the court.

Advertisement

Jutsice Lifu stated that the Supreme Court had, over the years, maintained that the judgement of a court cannot be arrested by litigant under any guise.

He also cited previous decisions of the court to back the ruling.

Advertisement

According to him, there is however an exception to this rule.

“This exception lies in the fact that where the process of court is about to be abused, it will be the duty of the court to prevent such an abuse.

Advertisement

“In the instant case, there is no express, direct and specific order of court staying the judgment of this court by the appellate court capable of creating such exception.

“In the case of Dingyadi vs. INEC (No.1) (2010) 18 NWLR Pt. 1224 1 2010 4-7 SC, the Sokoto Division of the Court of Appeal was specifically stopped from delivering judgment in an appeal basically to stop an abuse of court process.

Advertisement

“This is not the case here in my considered view.

“The defendants all participated in the proceedings, including the ones leading to the three interlocutory rulings and proceeded to adopt their respective objections to jurisdiction and the main originating summons.

Advertisement

“Fair hearing was duly granted to all parties and the judgment of the court was accordingly fixed in the presence of all parties or their counsel.

” If any party wants to suspend the operation of an order fixing a case for judgment, they must seek a specific order staying the effect of those orders.

Advertisement

“In my considered view, this is the implication of the court’s decision in the case of Zenith Bank Pic vs. John 2015 7NWLR Pt. 1458 393.

“In the absence of any specific order putting on hold the judgment of the court coupled with the fact that there is no inferred abuse of court process and counsel has adopted all their processes while this court has statutory limit to deliver its judgment, I hold that there is no legal impediment to the delivery of the judgment of this court.

Advertisement

“Based on my conclusion and reasoning aforesaid, the multiple preliminary objections of all the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th defendants as differently constituted, all fail and are accordingly dismissed,” justice Lifu declared.(NAN)

Advertisement
banner
Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: Guber candidate picks Kwankwaso’s son as Deputy guber candidate

Published

on

banner

The Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC) has named Mustapha Rabiu Kwankwaso as its deputy governorship candidate for the 2027 election in Kano State.

Mustapha, who is the first son of the party’s vice-presidential candidate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, will run alongside the NDC governorship candidate, Aminu Abdussalam Gwarzo.

Advertisement

The announcement was confirmed on Monday by the spokesperson of the Kwankwasiyya Movement, Habibu Saleh Mohammed.

In a statement, Mohammed disclosed that Gwarzo formally unveiled Mustapha Kwankwaso as his running mate ahead of the 2027 governorship election in the state.

Advertisement

“HE Aminu Abdussalam Gwarzo unveiled Hon Mustapha Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso as running mate for the 2027 Governorship Election,” the statement said.

Advertisement
banner
Continue Reading

Trending

© 2025, All Rights Reserved | Crime Channels