Connect with us

Published

on

Nigerian Police, Military, Civil Society others reject creation of Nigerian Marine Corps

On Monday, Deputy Spokesperson of the House of Representatives, Hon. Philip Agbese, joined other lawmakers, the Nigerian Navy, the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), the Nigerian Shippers Council, and several civil society organizations (CSOs) in rejecting a proposed Bill to establish the Nigerian Marine Corps.

The Bill, which was presented for a public hearing by the House Committee on Navy, aims to enhance maritime security and safeguard Nigeria’s blue economy. Titled A Bill for an Act to Establish the Nigerian Marine Corps to Promote Maritime Security (HB 225), it was sponsored by Hon. Alex Egbona (Cross River) and passed its second reading in the House on Thursday, November 30, 2023, before being referred to the Navy Committee for further review.

Opposing the Bill during the hearing, Agbese, who represents the Ado/Okpokwu/Ogbadibo Federal Constituency, argued that the creation of the proposed federal body to handle maritime law enforcement and defense would duplicate the roles already effectively carried out by the Nigerian Navy and other agencies, including NIMASA.

He warned that the establishment of such an agency would lead to unnecessary overlap in responsibilities and administrative inefficiencies.

Advertisement

Speaking on behalf of 66 other House members, Agbese emphasised the importance of scrutinizing proposed legislation to ensure that it serves the nation’s best interests and does not create redundant governmental structures.

Agbese said: “Acting under the mandate to promote efficient governance and resource management, we hereby call for the total and complete rejection of the bill proposing the establishment of the Nigerian Marine Corps.

“It is our contention as members of this legislative body that the creation of this new entity would only result in significant overlap, redundancy and logistical strain, creating operational inefficiencies and imposing unwarranted financial demands on the government.

“The proposed Act outlines the creation of a maritime enforcement agency charged with enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of federal laws on, under, and over Nigeria’s high seas and other waterways, Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and required to maintain a state of readiness to function as a specialized service within the Nigerian Navy in times of war. This proposed body raises multiple operational, economic and strategic concerns particularly in the areas of jurisdictional conflicts, wartime readiness, legal authority and environmental management.

“We have thoroughly examined this bill and its objectives and we assert that the establishment of a Nigerian Marine Corps is both redundant and counterproductive, given the existing roles, mandates and capacities of the Nigerian Navy and other maritime agencies.

Advertisement

“We therefore firmly and unequivocally call for the total defeat of the bill and a recommendation for its immediate withdrawal, while highlighting the compelling need to prioritize efficiency, fiscal responsibility and coherent maritime governance.”

The Nigeria Police Force also strongly criticised the proposed Bill to establish the Nigerian Marine Corps, calling it an ill-advised initiative.

They argued that the Bill would not only duplicate the responsibilities already handled by certain sections of the police but also contribute to the proliferation of maritime security agencies, potentially creating a parallel force to the Armed Forces of Nigeria.

While acknowledging the Bill’s good intentions, SP Nandom Vongjen, Staff Officer for the Marine Section of the Police Force, warned that it could lead to more problems than it resolves.

He advocated for a more strategic approach, urging that existing agencies be strengthened and their capabilities optimized. According to Vongjen, streamlining current structures and fostering greater inter-agency collaboration would enhance maritime security without incurring unnecessary costs or adding bureaucratic layers.

Advertisement

During the public hearing, other key stakeholders echoed similar concerns. Rear Admiral Olusegun Ferreira, Chief of Training & Operations for the Nigerian Navy, Mrs. Moji Jimoh, Coordinator for NIMASA’s Abuja Zonal Office, and Mr. Bala Saleh, Director of Legal Services for the Nigerian Shippers Council, all emphasized the need to fortify existing institutions rather than establishing new ones, which could introduce additional security risks for the country.

Civil society organizations (CSOs) also voiced their opposition to the Bill. Representatives from various CSOs, including Abdullahi Bilal (Spokesman for Security Analysts & Research Forum in Africa), Okwa Daniel (Executive Director of Centre for Social Justice, Equity & Transparency), Daniel Momoh Prince (National President of Nigerian Unemployed Youth Association), Igwe Ude-Umanta (Convener of Coalition of Civil Society Organisations on Economic Watch), and Opialu Fabian (Executive Director of Centre for Human Rights & Advocacy in Africa Network), all argued that the proposed Marine Corps was unnecessary and urged the House to reject the Bill during its third reading.

At the conclusion of the hearing, Hon. Yusuf Gadgi, Chairman of the House Committee on Navy, assured the public that the committee would carry out a thorough and impartial review of the Bill.

He emphasised that the committee’s role was to ensure that legislative actions are made in the best interest of the nation, free from bias.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

President Tinubu promises renovations of Police Barracks, improving mobility, robust Police welfare package

Published

on

President Tinubu promises renovations of Police Barracks, improving mobility, robust Police welfare package

President Bola Tinubu has assured Nigerians that his administration is working to enhance the nation’s security capabilities to effectively address the growing security challenges.

Speaking through his Vice, Senator Kashim Shettima, at the opening of the fifth edition of the Conference and Retreat for Senior Police Officers (CARSPO) in Abeokuta, Ogun State, President Tinubu emphasised the government’s commitment to improving the security infrastructure across the country.

The President noted that security is a key pillar for Nigeria’s socio-economic development, and his administration is focused on bolstering the operational readiness of security agencies. This includes providing the necessary equipment to handle emergencies and combat crime effectively.

“While the Nigeria Police Force is constitutionally empowered to maintain internal security, protect lives and property, and uphold public order, it is essential to recognise that security is a shared responsibility. Communities and citizens must actively collaborate with the police to foster a safer society,” Tinubu stated through his representative, Senator Shettima.

Advertisement

He highlighted that no matter how well-funded or equipped the police force is, it cannot succeed without the active support and trust of the public.

“Public engagement and trust are central to the process of inclusive policing,” the President affirmed.

Further reaffirming his administration’s commitment, President Tinubu pledged to enhance the Nigeria Police Force’s capacity to meet its constitutional duties, ensuring it is both effective and well-positioned to handle internal security.

He revealed that the federal government is focused on bridging gaps in security, infrastructure, and recruitment through a comprehensive program.

This initiative will include renovations of police barracks, improving police mobility, and upgrading essential combat and protective gear.

Advertisement

Additionally, Tinubu emphasised the importance of welfare for police personnel, pointing to the recent implementation of the new minimum wage as part of broader efforts to improve the living conditions of the Nigerian workforce, including law enforcement officers.

He assured that his administration will continue to collaborate with police leadership to provide financial incentives and motivate officers to perform at their highest levels.

The President also reiterated his administration’s commitment to reforming the country’s economic and security frameworks to restore investor confidence, stabilise the macroeconomic environment, and tackle inflation, marking his government’s multi-pronged approach to strengthening both the nation’s security and its economic foundation.

Continue Reading

News

Stop behaving like a child crying over spilled milk – Presidency slams El-Rufai

Published

on

Stop behaving like a child crying over spilled milk – Presidency slams El-Rufai

In response to recent remarks made by Nasir El-Rufai, the former governor of Kaduna State, the Presidency has stated that El-Rufai is upset at being left out of President Bola Tinubu’s cabinet.

In response to El-Rufai’s comments, Tinubu’s Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, urged the former governor to put the incident behind him and quit being a “child crying over spilled milk.”

El-Rufai had claimed in an interview on Arise Television that President Tinubu personally rejected him for a ministerial position, despite his efforts to secure the role.

According to El-Rufai, it wasn’t the National Assembly that blocked his appointment, but rather Tinubu himself.

Advertisement

Onanuga, in his response, acknowledged that El-Rufai’s reaction was natural for someone who had hoped for a ministerial appointment but emphasised that it was time for the former governor to accept the decision and focus on moving forward.

In an interview with Channels Television’s Sunrise Daily, Onanuga said: “As a person, I think I will pity the former governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El-Rufai. He feels hurt that he was not made a minister. I think it is time for him to move on.

“He can’t continue to behave like a child, as if somebody stole his bread and he is crying.

“It’s natural for him to feel hurt about being excluded, and the president acknowledged in his birthday message that Nasir helped a lot in installing Tinubu. If he’s not there, it doesn’t mean he should bring down the roof.

“The president has no animosity against Nasir. He naturally feels hurt that he has been excluded, so he goes about campaigning against the president and would not let go.

Advertisement

“He should forget about not being made a minister. He has been in public service since 1999; it’s time for him to move on.”

Continue Reading

News

Paternity dispute: Court stops Police from tendering DNA test result against ex-minister

Published

on

Paternity dispute: Court stops Police from tendering DNA test result against ex-minister

The Federal High Court in Abuja has restrained the Nigerian Police Force (NPF) from tendering a DNA test result against Mr Kabiru Turaki, former Special Duties and Inter-Governmental Affairs Minister.
Turaki is involved in a paternity dispute with a lady, Hadiza Baffa.
Justice Inyang Ekwo gave the order after M.L. Anthony, counsel for the the NPF, Inspector-General (I-G) of Police; and DCP Rita Oki Oyintare, who are 1st to 3rd respondents respectively, sought an adjournment to enable them comply with the earlier court order.
Turaki, through his lawyer, Abdulaziz Ibrahim, SAN, had told Justice Ekwo that the police was planning to present “the purported DNA test paternity result procured in violation of his fundamental human rights” in a criminal charge filed against him before an FCT Magistrate Court, Abuja.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Justice Ekwo had, on Feb. 18, declined the application filed by the former minister, seeking to stop the police from presenting the DNA test result in the paternity dispute with Hadiza in another court.
The judge, in a ruling on an ex-parte motion, moved by Ibrahim, held that he could not grant the relief sought by the former minister without hearing from the respondents.
The judge therefore ordered Turaki to put all the respondents in the application on notice within two days of the order and directed the respondents to show cause in the next adjourned date why the prayers sought by the ex-minister should not be granted.
When the matter was called, Ibrahim, who appeared for Turaki, informed the court that the matter was for the respondents to show cause why his client’s prayers should not be granted.
The senior lawyer, however, told the court that the 1st to 3rd respondents had refused to comply with the court order to file affidavits to show cause.
He said instead, they filed a joint counter affidavit to their substantive application.
Ibrahim said Hadiza, who is the 4th respondent, filed an affidavit to show cause and a counter affidavit to their main suit.
“The court will recall that it is the conduct of the 1st to 3rd respondents that is being challenged by this application and they have refused to obey the court order,” he said.
“Hold your peace, let me do my work,” the judge told Ibrahim.
Justice Ekwo then asked Anthony what process he had filed and he responded that they filed a counter affidavit to the applicant’s motion.
The judge frowned at his response and Anthony, therefore, sought an adjournment to enable them do the needful.
Usman Chamo, who appeared for Hadiza, whose daughter’s paternity is being disputed by Turaki, confirmed that they had filed an affidavit to show cause and a counter affidavit to the originating motion.
“If not for the 1st to 3rd respondents, I would have taken this matter now and determine everything together.
“Look at what he has done as he has asked for adjournment,” the judge said.
Justice Ekwo, who granted Anthony’s application for adjournment, restrained all the respondents from taking any step which might affect Turaki’s prayers on the motion ex-parte.
“I also make an order that the respondents should not do anything contrary to the prayers on the motion ex-parte until further orders of this court,” he declared.
The judge equally ordered the police to file all necessary processes and for the applicant to respond before the next adjourned date.
The court subsequently adjourned the matter until Feb. 28 for hearing.
NAN reports that Turaki, in the motion ex-parte marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/244/2025, had sued the NPF, I-G; DCP Rita Oki Oyintare, who is Deputy Commissioner of Police for Gender and Hadiza Musa Baffa as 1st to 4th respondents respectively.
In the motion dated Feb. 11 but filed Feb. 13, the ex-minister sought one relief.
He sought an order of interim injunction restraining the respondents from presenting, using, or relying on the purported DNA paternity test result procured from the DNA Labs Limited or any other DNA laboratory on Nov. 5, 2024, or any other date thereafter.
Giving a 13-ground argument why his application should be granted, Turaki said he instituted an action against Hadiza (4th respondent) vide suit No CV/35/2024 on June 24, 2024.
He said in the suit, he sought declaratory reliefs, including but not limited to a perpetual injunction restraining her from parading that she was married to him and that her child is from him.
He said that Hadiza caused several petitions to be written to the office of the 1st to 3rd respondents in connection with the subject matter in suit no CV/35/2024 and the petitions were consolidated upon application for consolidation by him vide the letter dated Sept.19, 2024.
The ex-minister alleged that on Nov. 5, 2024, he was invited by DCP Oyintare and he honoured the invitation .
He further alleged that upon honouring the invitation, Oyintare insisted that she must take a swab from him to conduct a DNA to prove the paternity of Hadiza’s daughter.
He said though he protested, he was detained at the Force Criminal Investigation Department’s cell at Area 10, Garki, Abuja for about 6 hours from 12 noon till 6pm, and at about 9pm, his “swab sample was collected by a purported scientist at the behest of the 3rd respondent,” before he was allowed to go home at about 10pm on that day.
Turaki said the purported DNA test paternity result procured in violation of his fundamental human rights was being planned to be used in a criminal charge filed against him before the Federal Capital Territory, Magistrate Court, Abuja.
“Unless this honourable court promptly intervenes, the respondents will rely on the said purported DNA test paternity result, the validity or otherwise being the subject matter of the instant suit,” he said.(NAN)(l

Continue Reading

Trending