The Senate Ad-Hoc Committee on Security Challenges on Wednesday presented a 74 page report during plenary on why on why the nation’s security agencies are underperforming in the fight against insecurity.
The Senate had set up the Committee in January 2020 to engage the security agencies with a view to restructuring the country’s security architecture.
The report highlighted 18 points in its report: These are;
1. Almost all the institutions have weak and antiquated legislation most of which were done either during the colonial era or under military administrations and therefore do not reflect the challenges of the moment and the desire of the democratic dispensation.
2. There are very ill-defined operational boundaries and overlapping jurisdictions among the security services leading to confusion in priority setting, platform acquisition, training, direction and general orientation.
3. There is a lot of internal incoherence and inter-personnel conflict which have led to a lot of antagonism within the security organizations.
4. Most of the agencies are operating in isolation with very little, if any, coordination between them.
5. Inter-agency rivalry and endless battles of supremacy have undermined operational effectiveness.
6. The alleged non-funding of the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) since 2015 has undermined the effective performance of its coordinating function in the security architecture, has led many agencies to question its authority and relevance in various fora thereby adversely affecting inter-service cooperation and Intelligence Sharing.
7. The law governing the operation of the three (3) intelligence agencies i.e. Department of State Services (DSS), National Intelligence Agency (NIA) and Defence Intelligent Agency (DIA) is very defective and clearly responsible for the failure to define their functions, boundaries and relationships with one another.
8. There is very little effective and committed leadership to guide, motivate and focus the security institutions on the challenges of their responsibilities, and how to go about fulfilling them in a creative, innovative and cooperative manner.
9. The general absence of a performance, monitoring and evaluation mechanism within the institutions and services have undermined discipline and due diligence in the conduct of security related operations.
10. Allegations have been rife that the quest for personal wealth acquisition has undermined institutional coherence and discipline and resulted in allegations of wastage of funds and squandering of appropriated resources.
11. The security agencies tend to acquire modern technology and other force multipliers in isolation which resulted in the multiplication of incompatible platforms belonging to the different arms of services.
12. Inadequate funding of almost all the security and intelligence agencies.
13.In almost all the Services, there is a general lack of proper acquisition and maintenance culture of the expensive equipment and platforms used for defence and internal security operations.
14. The prevalence of importing all the nation’s national security equipment and gadgets undermines the security of the nation and amounts to colossal wastages when expensive equipment remain unserviceable due to lack of simple components, spare parts or servicing materials.
15. Absence of an effective centralized criminal database for the country.
16. Lack of comprehensive identity management data covering the country’s population with no interface of databases belonging to several institutions such as INEC, BVN, NCC, NIMC, Immigration, Customs, etc.
17. The Communications Infrastructure in the country is generally weak so are many blind spots which need to be covered in order to ensure that every space of the country is served.
18. Most of the security institutions, particularly the Police lack well-trained Personnel, functional and well-equipped training Institutions. Where Institutions are available, they are dilapidated and training is done in isolation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c793/4c793978916979ecddaccee57f44c81ec7237d81" alt=""
News
Several gunmen neutralised as Military personnel hit suspected Bandits in major ambush
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c09d1/c09d178c2b663886057de00d49748e4aeaf0d70a" alt=""
Several people neutralised as Military personnel hit suspected Bandits in major ambush
Nigerian Air Force (NAF) soldiers have killed a number of bandits in Tsafe Local Government Area (LGA), Zamfara State, in a decisive operation that involved targeted airstrikes.
The strike came after a well-planned intelligence operation, according to a report from “Zagazola Makama,” one of the top counter-insurgency publications in the Lake Chad region.
According to sources, the robbers had left Tsafe LGA and were thought to be connected to the notorious bandit boss Ado Aliero.
Their mission was to rustle cattle from nearby communities, a crime they successfully carried out before attempting to escape with the stolen livestock.
However, their retreat was cut short when they encountered resistance from local security forces. As the bandits moved into a mountainous area, security forces, tracking their movements, set up an ambush. Upon confirming the bandits’ location, the Nigerian Air Force was promptly alerted.
With precision, air assets were deployed to engage the fleeing bandits. Eyewitness accounts confirmed that numerous bandits were neutralized, though the precise death toll remained unverified at the time of the report.
Sources further revealed that at least 23 bandits were killed, with several others suffering injuries. Additionally, a significant number of rustled cattle were recovered by the troops, dealing a severe blow to the criminal operation in the region.
This successful strike underscores the growing effectiveness of coordinated intelligence and military operations in the ongoing fight against banditry and insurgency in northern Nigeria.
News
President Tinubu’s Minister takes on Ganduje as fesh crisis rocis APC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89674/89674825b94d8b93b12e5cc2e13811a868099609" alt=""
President Tinubu’s Minister takes on Ganduje as fesh crisis rocis APC
The Minister of State for Housing, Yusuf Abdullahi Atta, has cautioned the National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress, APC, Dr Umar Abdullahi Ganduje against any attempts to allow the current Chairman of the APC in Kano to continue in office for a fourth term.
The Minister was quoted to have warned that any attempt to gives the current Chairman of the APC, Abdullahi Abbas another chance, would lead to serious crises in the party.
The Minister issued the threats at a caucus meeting in Fagge Local Government Area of Kano, on Saturday.
The Minister said, “we will not take it lightly with anybody trying to return Abdullahi Abbas to office after the expiration of his tenure, because it violates the constitution of the party”.
“We would not accept the Chairman, Abdullahi Abbas to be imposed on us for the fourth term, this will surely result in us decamping immediately from the party”, he threatened.
“We are saying loud and clear, I swear if Abdullahi Abbas is given another chance all of us will decamp from the party and APC will crash and lose 2027, this is my message to anybody who cares to listen”.
Yusuf Atta alleged that the arrogant and misguided disposition of Abdullahi Abbas as state Chairman is among the many negative tendencies that crippled and made the party to lost power in 2023.
“And up till today, the same person has not changed, therefore we are strongly warning that in any case and anyhow Abdullahi Abbas is given another chance everyone should consider the Party losing 2027.
” We were given good training by our parents and we know who God is, we never dare him but this man doesnt know that, therefore with him as Chairman APC is a foregone party in Kano.”
Atta said in 2023, APC won the governorship contest with Gawuna and Sule Garo as candidate and deputy but that Anti God remarks of Abdullahi Abbas truncated their victory.
There are reports that the National Chairman of the APC, Abdullahi Ganduje is planning on reimposing Abdullahi Abbas to continue as the state chairman of the party for the fourth term.
News
Why we removed Buhari’s Govt in 1985 through Military coup – IBB gives further revelations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd028/cd02875d08df5301530f06e637b39cd72eb51d35" alt=""
Why we removed Buhari’s Govt in 1985 through Military coup – IBB gives further revelations
In a striking revelation, former military president General Ibrahim Babangida (retd) has shed light on the underlying cause of Major General Muhammadu Buhari’s ousting in 1985. According to Babangida, the removal of Buhari was a direct result of his tendency to personalize leadership during his time as Head of State.
Buhari, who initially came to power in a military coup in December 1983 that removed then-President Shehu Shagari, was himself toppled two years later. Babangida, who played a pivotal role in that power shift, shared insights in his book ‘A Journey in Service’, where he discussed the “holier-than-thou” mindset exhibited by both Buhari and his deputy, the late Brigadier Tunde Idiagbon. This approach, Babangida argued, alienated the military and the general public, pushing the nation to a critical tipping point.
Reflecting on the events that led to the 1985 coup, Babangida pointed out that Buhari’s leadership style not only distanced him from his own military constituency but also led to a breakdown in relations with the civil populace, which ultimately paved the way for his ouster.
His words: “The change in leadership had become necessary as a response to the worsening mood of the nation and growing concern about our future as a people. All through the previous day, as we flew from Minna and drove through Lagos towards Bonny Camp, I was deeply reflecting on how we as a nation got to this point and how and why I found myself at this juncture of fate. By the beginning of 1985, the citizenry had become apprehensive about the future of our country.
The atmosphere was precarious and fraught with ominous signs of clear and present danger. It was clear to the more discerning leadership of the armed forces that our initial rescue mission of 1983 had largely miscarried.
We now stood the risk of having the armed forces split down the line because our rescue mission had largely derailed. If the armed forces imploded, the nation would go with it, and the end was just too frightening to contemplate. Divisions of opinion within the armed forces had come to replace the unanimity of purpose that informed the December 1983 change of government.
In state affairs, the armed forces, as the only remaining institution of national cohesion, were becoming torn into factions; something needed to be done lest we lose the nation itself. My greatest fear was that division of opinion and views within the armed forces could lead to factionalisation in the military. If allowed to continue and gain root, grave dangers lay ahead.
“My predecessor in office, Major General Muhammadu Buhari, and his deputy, Brigadier Tunde Idiagbon, had separated themselves from the mainstream of the armed forces by personalising what was initially a collective leadership. They both posited a ‘holier than thou’ attitude, antagonising the civil populace against the military. Fundamental rights and freedoms were being routinely infringed upon and abused. As a military administration, we were now presiding over a society that was primarily frightened of us. We were supposed to improve their lives and imbue the people with hope for a better future.
“Instead, we ruled the nation with a series of draconian decrees. An administration intended to reflect the collective will of the armed forces as a national institution came to be seen as the private personal autocracy of a stubborn few. Like most military coups, our leadership change was informed by widespread disquiet among the civil populace. Ordinary people were experiencing severe economic hardship. The general economic and social conditions the people lived under were worsening by the day.
“Yet arbitrary controls in all aspects of economic life and an ancient resort to barter in international trade meant that the nation’s financial woes would not end soon. Draconian decrees led to the abuse and severe limitation of basic freedoms as people were clamped into indefinite detention, most times for minor infractions. Punishment for crimes against the state had led to the pursuit of mechanical legalistic justice against the dictates of natural justice. As the Chief of Army Staff, I was under undue pressure from the rank and file to seek ways of reconnecting the government to society lest we lose the nation itself.
“On several occasions and instances, even the very integrity of the armed forces was being called into question. A disciplinary case involving allegations of divided interest against some senior officers was decided without due recourse to the Army Council. Instead of waiting for a report and investigation from the Army leadership, the affected officers were unceremoniously relieved of their commission, and their military career of so many years was abruptly ended without any input from the Army as their institution of origin. I objected to this arbitrariness and disregard for due process. I confided in some senior colleagues that I would rather resign my commission than continue in office as Chief of Army Staff without input into decisions that concern the careers of personnel under my command.
“In response, I was placed under surveillance, with the privacy of my communications and those of my family constantly monitored. This tense atmosphere culminated in the unanimous decision of a broad spectrum of senior and middle-level officers to change the nation’s leadership. The processes associated with this change were completed without bloodshed by midnight on August 26, 1985. ON AUGUST 27, 1985, I assumed office as the nation’s new leader, fully aware of the many challenge confronting the country. I had no illusions about the direction in which to move the country. I had long-standing convictions about Nigeria born of many decades of comprehensive consultations with a broad spectrum of compatriots from nearly all walks of life. Having been part of all previous government changes, I had become quite familiar with the wishes and aspirations of our people and developed a template of what needed to be done, at least from my modest perspective. The new administration’s determination was informed by a genuine desire to end the cycle of instability in both the politics and general history of the nation. I made this clear in my inaugural address to the nation.”
-
5 years ago
Our situation in Kano terrible – Gov Ganduje cries out
-
News2 weeks ago
FG pledges commitment to enhance Police officers Welfare, implement Tinubu’s 8-point agenda for NPF
-
News1 month ago
DPO under investigation for allegedly taking teenage girl to his home while in police custody
-
News4 weeks ago
JUST IN; Commissioner of Police bows out of Service
-
News3 weeks ago
JUST IN; IG of Police orders Police Commands to involve PCRC in their operations
-
News4 weeks ago
BREAKING; NLC declare nationwide protest
-
News4 weeks ago
JUST IN: 30 graves, shrine dangerous weapons found inside Hotel
-
News1 month ago
BREAKING; President Tinubu commissions Bola Ahmed Tinubu Barracks